Re: You got to be in it to win it!
Besides....
XCUD is trying to have their cake and eat it to.
On the one hand they argued that justice delayed was justice not served.
They complained that the CUD defendants were denied a quick trial which deprived them of their rights to have a quick resolution.
All the while they were doing all they could do to delay a quick resolution.
They huffed and puffed and failed to provide a defense.
The Court awaiting their response was simultaneously accused by the same defendants and their supporters of unduly extending the trial further denying them of a quick resolution.
At the end the Court exercised its only option when the defendants refused to put up a defense.
Now one can interpret why they refused to have a trial. Maybe the evidence was so overwhelming and incriminating that had a trial been conducted, the whole world would have seen how guilty they were in forming and directing an attempted insurrection.
Such a scenario would no doubt destroy them beyond repair.
In the US a defendant faced with overwhelming evidence pointing to his guilt will often accept a plea deal with the prosecution in order to receive a less harsh sentence.
Just maybe the CUD defendants chose to not mount a defense because their guilt was so overwhelming.
Finding themselves in a, lose-lose scenario, they just may have decided to defy the constitution so that a guilty plea would be entered and their guilt not exposed.
At the same time the engine that drives the buggy CUD formula quickly shouted that Justice was denied because the Court acted in haste making a decision.
Come on....they can not have it both ways.
They can not scream that justice delayed is Justice denied and then flip flop and shout Justice is not justice because it was done in quickly.
What a mess have these people created for themsleves at ever turn. How can one make so many mistakes? Amazing!
On 6/13/07, Dg; wrote:
XCUD is trying to have their cake and eat it to.
On the one hand they argued that justice delayed was justice not served.
They complained that the CUD defendants were denied a quick trial which deprived them of their rights to have a quick resolution.
All the while they were doing all they could do to delay a quick resolution.
They huffed and puffed and failed to provide a defense.
The Court awaiting their response was simultaneously accused by the same defendants and their supporters of unduly extending the trial further denying them of a quick resolution.
At the end the Court exercised its only option when the defendants refused to put up a defense.
Now one can interpret why they refused to have a trial. Maybe the evidence was so overwhelming and incriminating that had a trial been conducted, the whole world would have seen how guilty they were in forming and directing an attempted insurrection.
Such a scenario would no doubt destroy them beyond repair.
In the US a defendant faced with overwhelming evidence pointing to his guilt will often accept a plea deal with the prosecution in order to receive a less harsh sentence.
Just maybe the CUD defendants chose to not mount a defense because their guilt was so overwhelming.
Finding themselves in a, lose-lose scenario, they just may have decided to defy the constitution so that a guilty plea would be entered and their guilt not exposed.
At the same time the engine that drives the buggy CUD formula quickly shouted that Justice was denied because the Court acted in haste making a decision.
Come on....they can not have it both ways.
They can not scream that justice delayed is Justice denied and then flip flop and shout Justice is not justice because it was done in quickly.
What a mess have these people created for themsleves at ever turn. How can one make so many mistakes? Amazing!
On 6/13/07, Dg; wrote:
Even more reason to go to court! You are under the critical eye of the Safeguarder of Democracy (USA, Bush) and as such, are subject to criticism and other actions if you act in an Undemocratic manner. I would think that every DEMOCRAT would be hoping for anything to criticize Bush and his new ally (meles) for their actions in Somalia or anywhere in general...It would have been a smart move towards longevity of the opposition to do that.Like I said from day 1, I was pleasantly surprised by CUD and the movement it generated amongst the people. But that doesn't make you ready to run a country. Anyone who thought they were should by now have realized that the party was a Lemon. Time always Tells.Them guys quit when the going went rough. You do that when you are running a country and you open it up for corruption, scandal and risk of it becoming like a Nigeria (sorry Nigeria!).
T; wrote:ya ya ya.........the usual excuses!
On 6/13/07, S; wrote:Who you foolin? Meles is there as Bush's puppet because he invaded Somalia for him. He is the neo-cons darling now don't you know. No Somalia and Mele would not have been in this picture.
posted by Mechachal yichalal at 2:43 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home